Recruiting good people is hard. Recruiting good people who genuinely want the role, understand what they are joining and still want to be there a year later can be harder still.

For small and medium sized organisations, every appointment matters. A poor hiring decision does not disappear quietly into a workforce of thousands. It can affect customers, workload, culture, management time and the performance of an entire team.

This is one reason the idea of becoming a destination employer matters. A destination employer is an organisation people actively want to work for. You might also describe it as an employer of choice.

That does not mean having the biggest salary budget, the most elaborate office or an employer brand full of glossy promises. It means building a workplace where the right people can look at the organisation and think:

I understand what this business is trying to achieve. I know what will be expected of me. I can see how I could contribute here. And this looks like somewhere I would want to stay.

For an SME competing with larger organisations for talent, that can be a powerful advantage.

Becoming an employer of choice starts before recruitment

Many organisations start thinking about retention when somebody resigns.  That is too late.

Retention begins with the decisions made before a vacancy is advertised.

  • What does the role actually require?
  • What would good performance look like?
  • What behaviours will help somebody succeed in this particular environment?
  • What challenges will they face?
  • What authority will they have?
  • What support and resources will be available?
  • And what is it really like to work here?

The clearer the organisation is about these questions, the easier it becomes to recruit with intention rather than simply filling an empty seat. This matters because sometimes the problem is not that a candidate was a poor employee. The problem was a poor match between what the person expected, what the organisation needed and what the job actually became. Being an employer of choice is not about being attractive to everyone.

It is about being attractive to the people who are more likely to thrive in the work and environment you genuinely offer.

Do not sell a job that does not exist

Recruitment is marketing, but it should still tell the truth. When organisations are struggling to attract applicants, the temptation is to make the role sound as appealing as possible. Flexible. Collaborative. Autonomous. Fast moving. Development focused. Great culture.

But candidates eventually meet the real organisation.

  • If autonomy actually means every decision requires approval, say so.
  • If the job includes repetitive or difficult work, explain it.
  • If weekend work is part of the role, make that clear.
  • If the organisation is changing quickly and processes are still developing, candidates should know that too.

Research into realistic job previews has explored the value of giving candidates more balanced information about both the attractive and challenging aspects of a job. One important mechanism appears to be the perception that the organisation is being honest with applicants and employees.

That principle is useful even without turning recruitment into a formal intervention.

Be attractive, but be accurate.

You do not want somebody accepting the job you described and resigning when they discover the job you actually have.

Hire with more than instinct

Small businesses often pride themselves on knowing people. That experience can be valuable. It can also create blind spots.

Unstructured interviews can easily become conversations about shared interests, similar backgrounds, first impressions or whether somebody simply feels like a good fit. A more structured interview gives each candidate a fairer opportunity to demonstrate evidence relevant to the job.

Research has consistently found advantages from adding structure to employment interviews, and studies have found that past behavioural and situational questions can provide useful information about later job performance.

The aim is not to remove human judgement. It is to give human judgement better information.

Look Beyond a Good Interview

A confident interview doesn’t necessarily translate into strong workplace performance.

Candidates describe their experience in one environment, while the role they’re applying for may involve very different expectations, relationships and pressures.

Someone can have an impressive employment history and still struggle in a new organisation. Equally, a candidate who doesn’t immediately stand out may have considerable potential.

For SMEs, where every appointment can make a difference, getting this wrong can be costly.

The challenge is understanding whether the organisation and the candidate have a realistic picture of what working together will involve.

That takes more than instinct, impressive qualifications or a few polished interview answers.

A successful appointment isn’t simply about finding someone who can get the job. It’s about finding someone who can succeed once they’re in it.

A Good Interview Should Reveal More Than Rehearsed Answers

Most candidates prepare for interviews, and quite rightly so. But a polished answer doesn’t always tell us much about how someone behaves when they’re faced with the realities of work.

Good interviewers recognise the difference between a convincing story and meaningful evidence of capability. That distinction matters because recruitment decisions have consequences well beyond the interview itself.

For smaller organisations, the cost of a poor appointment can affect colleagues, customers, productivity and management time.

The quality of the hiring decision depends on the quality of the information behind it.

Where behavioural assessments can help

A behavioural assessment can add another source of information to a structured selection or development process. It should not make the hiring decision.

flowprofiler® does not identify somebody as the “right person”, predict whether they will be loyal or provide a definitive measure of job suitability.

People are more complex than that.

flowprofiler® measures workplace behavioural patterns across emotional and social intelligence, resilience and motivation, including how those behaviours may differ between day to day conditions and pressure.

Used responsibly, those insights can help interviewers identify useful areas for deeper conversation.

For example:

  • If a role requires considerable autonomy, you might explore how somebody makes decisions when guidance is limited.
  • If perseverance appears particularly strong, you might explore when the candidate decides to keep pushing and when they decide to change direction.
  • If recognition is an important motivational driver, you might explore what good feedback looks like to that individual.
  • The assessment creates questions, not verdicts.
  • That distinction matters.

A structured interview, evidence from previous experience, role requirements, references, relevant skills and appropriately used assessment data can together provide a richer picture than any one source alone.

Explore flowprofiler® Behavioural Assessments

Do not confuse cultural fit with sameness

“Will they fit our culture?” sounds like a sensible recruitment question.

It can also become an excuse for recruiting people who think, behave and communicate like the existing team.

A better question might be: Can this person work effectively within the important expectations of this organisation while bringing something valuable of their own?

You may need alignment around integrity, safety, customer standards, responsibility or purpose. You do not need everybody to have the same personality, background, opinions or working style. Strong organisations need enough alignment to work together and enough difference to think well.

Winning the candidate is only the beginning

Becoming an employer of choice does not finish when the employment contract is signed. Now the organisation has to deliver.

The first months of employment give people a great deal of information.

  • Were the promises made during recruitment accurate?
  • Is the role clear?
  • Does the manager communicate expectations?
  • Can employees get the resources they need?
  • Do people receive useful feedback?
  • Are good ideas heard?
  • Can mistakes be discussed?
  • Is development real or merely mentioned in the job advertisement?
  • Do leaders behave consistently with the organisation’s stated values?

People experience an organisation through thousands of small interactions. The employer brand says what you promise. The employee experience reveals whether the promise was credible.

When Good People Struggle to Perform

Hiring good people is only part of the equation.

Organisations sometimes make the mistake of assuming that once they’ve recruited a capable employee, strong performance will naturally follow.

But even talented, motivated people can struggle when the working environment makes it difficult to succeed.

The warning signs aren’t always obvious. What looks like poor performance may have little to do with the individual’s capability or willingness to contribute.

And when organisations misunderstand the cause, they risk losing good people while the underlying problem remains.

For SMEs, where resources are often stretched and individual contributions can have a significant impact, these issues can become expensive very quickly.

Recruiting the right people matters. Creating an organisation where they can perform matters just as much.

Give good people reasons to stay

We should also be careful with the word loyalty. An organisation cannot reliably recruit for loyalty. Nor should staying indefinitely be treated as the only sign of a successful employment relationship.

What an organisation can do is create conditions that make staying attractive.

People are more likely to see a future where they can contribute when they understand what matters, have useful autonomy, experience good leadership, develop capability, receive appropriate recognition, work with people they trust and see purpose in what they are doing.

Sometimes good people will still leave. Careers change. Families move. Opportunities appear. Circumstances shift. The objective is not to prevent every departure.

It is to avoid losing good people for reasons the organisation could reasonably have addressed.

For SMEs, your size can be an advantage

Large organisations can compete with substantial employer brands, specialist recruitment teams and large benefits budgets. SMEs have different advantages. You can often create closer relationships. Candidates can meet the people they will actually work with. Leaders can be visible. Decisions can sometimes happen faster. Individual contribution can be easier to see. Development can be highly practical. People can have meaningful influence over how the organisation grows.

Do not try to imitate the employee proposition of a multinational. Build the strongest version of the organisation you actually are.

Australian businesses continue to report skills shortages, with the ABS finding that 35% of businesses experienced shortages during 2024–25. Among the reasons reported were specialist skills requirements, recruitment speed and misalignment between applicant expectations and the employment conditions being offered.

For SMEs, clarity and credibility can be competitive strengths.

Becoming a destination employer is not an HR project

You cannot market your way into becoming an employer of choice. Recruitment might introduce people to the organisation, but everyday experience builds its reputation. That makes this a leadership issue.

Leaders influence:

  • who gets recruited
  • what behaviour gets rewarded
  • how expectations are communicated
  • whether people are trusted
  • how mistakes are handled
  • whether capability grows
  • how accountability works
  • and whether employees experience the organisation described to them during recruitment.

The strongest employer proposition is not a slogan.

It is evidence.

It is what current employees tell prospective employees when no manager is listening.

What Makes Good People Want to Stay?

When an organisation struggles to attract or retain employees, it’s tempting to look for a quick solution.

Improve the job advertisement. Offer more flexibility. Increase salaries. Introduce another employee benefit.

Any of these might help, but they won’t necessarily address why people are reluctant to join or why existing employees are choosing to leave.

The reasons are often more complex than they first appear.

An organisation’s reputation as an employer is built through everyday experiences, not just its recruitment campaigns or employee benefits.

For SMEs, understanding those experiences can reveal opportunities to strengthen leadership, improve performance and make the organisation somewhere good people genuinely want to work.

The challenge is knowing where meaningful change will make the greatest difference.

Attract the right people. Then give them reasons to stay.

Becoming an employer of choice is not about persuading more applicants to want your jobs. It is about building an organisation the right applicants can understand, choose and trust.

  • Recruit honestly.
  • Interview intelligently.
  • Look for evidence.
  • Understand behaviour.
  • Make expectations clear.
  • Develop capability.
  • Lead people well.
  • Build systems that enable them to succeed.

That is how a small organisation can become somewhere talented people actively want to join, and somewhere good people can see a reason to stay.

Because attraction may start the relationship. The experience determines what happens next.

Want better insight into workplace behaviour?

flowprofiler® measures 18 workplace behavioural dimensions across emotional and social intelligence, resilience and motivation, including how behaviour may shift under pressure.

Used alongside structured interviews, clear role requirements and sound professional judgement, behavioural insight can help organisations ask better questions, develop people more effectively and build stronger leadership capability.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2026). Characteristics of Australian Business, 2024–25. Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Earnest, D. R., Allen, D. G., & Landis, R. S. (2011). Mechanisms linking realistic job previews with turnover: A meta analytic path analysis. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 865–897.

Hartwell, C. J., Johnson, C. D., & Posthuma, R. A. (2019). Are we asking the right questions? Predictive validity comparison of four structured interview question types. Journal of Business Research, 100, 122–129.

Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & DeNisi, A. S. (2000). A meta analytic examination of realistic job preview effectiveness: A test of three counterintuitive propositions. Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), 407–434.